It dawned on me as I was teaching my second year Writing Novels for Young People
group. I’ve noticed that a first person
narrative works well for young adults, especially when it is in the present
tense, even though in other contexts I argue that a third person close
narrative allows us to experience the growth
with a character. The first person narrator has already had the growth.
Emotional closeness
The young adult is an emotional creature, full of mood
swings, wavering self-esteem and having a brain that makes decisions in an
illogical way. There must be a real closeness between reader and writer. The
voice of a text comes through the gap between the reader and the writer. Most
writers of young adult novels are middle-aged or older yet the narrators never
sound that way. The writer has created the narrator as another character.
First person distant
There can be a problem with eye-witness accounts years after
the event. They are no longer the people they were at the time the event
happened. Memory may have failed but more importantly the narrator has had
several years in which to rationalise what happened according to their own
belief system, something that also evolves over time. Hence, The Diary of Anne Frank gives a more
reliable account of certain aspects of the Holocaust than some present day
survivors’ reports.
I first realised this in a critique group where in one story
a maid was giving an account of her first day in a big house. This
sophisticated account couldn’t possibly come from the little girl whose arms
were too short to get the covers on the bed properly. A close third person
would work better here than a “distant first person”.
The ideal young adult voice
This is of one young adult speaking to another, probably as
best mates. They don’t realise they have grown until the end of the book. Their
narration is an attempt to find some rationalisation within their own mind and
possibly to gain some from the friend they address. Of course, that friend remains
silent, but will be figuring out what is going on, possibly matching events
with what s/he is experiencing in her / his own life.
I’m quite convinced that Bella Swan did not know what was
going to happen in New Moon when she
told us about Twilight. In fact, she probably did not know what was
going to happen in the second chapter as she narrated the first. We do go on
the journey with her and possibly follow her more closely than we would if the
story was narrated in close third person.
Not easy
I’m on the second draft of a young adult novel and have
decided to move from third person close past tense to first person past tense
with just one chapter in the present tense. I’m finding it’s not just a matter
of changing “she” to “I” and making the verbs agree.
For instance:
Gisela wiped
the dust off the tiny window pane. The attic apartment was small but cosy. The
sun streamed in and took away some of the gloom. She looked over at Trudi who
was slumped, exhausted in the one comfortable chair. “Don’t worry. We’ll soon
make it look like home.”
“I’ll give you a hand in a minute. Just let
me get my breath back.”
Gisela shook her head and laughed. “You just
sit there.” She waved her arms around the small sitting-room. “It won’t exactly
take me hours.”
Trudi nodded towards the window. “Are there
still a lot of people out there?”
becomes:
I wiped the
dust off the tiny window pane. The attic apartment was small but cosy. The sun
streamed in and took away some of the gloom. I looked over at Trudi. She worried me. She was slumped in the one
comfortable chair. She was pale and her shoulders drooped. She closed her eyes.
“Don’t worry,” I whispered. “We’ll soon make
it look like home.” I wondered whether we ever would, though.
“I’ll give you a hand in a minute. Just let
me get my breath back.”
I shook my head and forced a laugh. “You just
sit there.” I waved my arms around the small sitting-room. “It won’t exactly
take me hours.” I would only have to lean a little and I’d be able to touch the
walls without moving from the spot.
She nodded towards the window. “Are there
still a lot of people out there?”
The first person forces more inner monologue and in places
(not shown here so much) creates different language – i.e. the words that the
view point character would use. The third person close does this to some extent
but it is enriched here I the “first person immediate”.
I probably haven’t got this quite right yet. I need to get
away from the original a little more.
A definition of the ‘first person immediate’
The story is told immediately after events have happened
with no post event rationalisation. The reader can enjoy the growth with the
protagonist. It may be difficult to prevent it sounding as if the narrator is
walking around with notebook and pen in hand. It leaves the reader the opportunity
to decide what is happening.
No comments:
Post a Comment