Showing posts with label common mistakes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label common mistakes. Show all posts

Sunday, 20 May 2012

SCBWI Professional Series UK North West


I’m pleased to see that this is really taking off now and was very well attended yesterday. Philippa Donovan, an editor with Egmont and director of her own company, Smart Quill, an editorial agency ran a workshop with us. Philippa has worked previously as a scout for publishers.

Smart Quill

She started Smart Quill as a solution to the problem that editors these days have very little time to actually do much editorial work on a book. So, with her two different hats on she tends to see books at the start of their journey and at the end. In between, the writer may work further on the script, have a further dialogue with Philippa, find an agent, work on the agent’s suggestions and eventually find a publisher – it may even be Egmont!

Knowing the industry

As always, some of the advice Philippa gave I’d heard before and some of it contradicted what I’d heard before. After all, there is a certain amount of subjectivity throughout the business and it is always changing. She mentioned that we need to know the business and that the business is becoming more transparent.
I’m not going to try to capture the whole of her talk here, but I’ll just flag up the things that seemed particularly important to me.

Self-publishing digitally

A lot of the prejudice about self-publishing is vanishing now and it is all right to submit books that have been digitally published – particularly if a title has sold well. You still ought to buy in editorial services and design ones as well if you are not techy enough. Publishers are good at creating lovely products and marketing them. Nevertheless, self-publishing gives you a platform and some visibility. It may be particularly good for picture books as you are no longer restricted to selling co-editions nor are you restricted to a certain number of spreads.

Publishing digitally with a publisher

This may be where you need your agent more than ever – digital rights can be very tricky to negotiate.

What to think about as you start writing

As soon as you are ready to turn your idea into a piece of fiction, think about its marketability. Which age group will your story suit best? What is going to push the narrative? The voice, pace, composition, character, or plot? Read to see how other writers use narratives. Do you want to be similar to one of them or deliberately different?  Read bestsellers – even ones you know you will not like – and then write the book you want to write. At least you will know where it sits in the market.

Common faults

I was quite gratified to see that Philippa’s list was very similar to my own- I’ve mentioned these before on this blog.
Telling instead of showing – and she mentioned that is actually quite hard to turn telling into showing.  Far better to have too much showing – you can always take some away.  
Vagueness – particularly about emotions.
Prefacing with too much author presence – unless this is part of the style.
Overload of detail
Repetition
Point of view changes – it’s okay to change point of view but not too often and not too violently  
Inconsistency in point of view / voice.
Poor characterisation - and yes she agrees with me you have to know EVERYTHING about your characters but you don’t need to write everything down and somehow what you do write carries the whole message.    
Dialogue – must be what characters would say in a given situation but not too natural or it becomes boring. Only hint at accents / dialects.
Plot should not overburden reader. There shouldn’t be too much of it.
Finally – if in doubt, take it out.

Why we need agents and how to find them

They are the first point of selection. They have good relationships with publishers. They know the industry well. The publisher focuses on products, the agents on people.
Many agents have become independent recently. They may be good to work with as they have no back list – so they will work on the forward list – which includes your book! And you really need them to negotiate your digital and foreign rights.
Look for a personality that suits yours. Google them. Read books from their client lists. Maybe send to three at a time. Show them that you have understood the industry.  Tell them why you have chosen them.
It really was a very informative afternoon. Thanks to Steph Williams and SCBWI for organising it.       

Friday, 21 November 2008

Common Mistakes

I get to read a lot of scripts. There are my own, the ones I see as an editor, the ones my students have written and the ones I see in various critique groups to which I belong. You begin to see a pattern. There are, in fact, four major faults that people make, and if they could do away with these mistakes, their work would improve vastly.

First, and this is undoubtedly the one that needs to be put right first, is that a story or a non-fiction piece lacks structure. The resolution may be unconvincing and too quickly exposed because clues haven’t been left throughout the text. Often, the story takes too long to get going. Sometimes, there is a jump straight from opening to climax.

Then there is all that telling instead of showing. This probably comes from a need to get the story down. This is fine – but it should only happen in the first draft. Just so that you know, I actually do fourteen drafts of my novels. In each draft I check for one thing. I have one check which involves seeing whether I am telling instead of showing. To show, you need to write with the senses, have dialogue, inner thoughts of characters – but not too many, and actions, and certainly no moralising.

A third fault is shifting point of view. Omniscient author is currently unfashionable, unless you actually make him / her another character, but even when it was in vogue, good writers stuck with that point of view. It really does prevent reader engagement if one flits around from consciousness to consciousness. Slightly more skilled writers do attempt to stay with one point of view, but sometimes slip into a neutral stance, which makes the narrative distance clunky.

The fourth fault is poorly constructed dialogue. Dialogue should sound natural but not actually be too natural. It should always show character or move the plot forward. Many novices produce cliché-ridden dialogue. Sometimes, also, a slightly more experienced writer will produce very good dialogue but which takes us nowhere. The writer has enjoyed themselves. Whilst this is a good exercise for the writing muscles, that particular piece of dialogue may have no place in that text. This is possibly a darling which needs killing.

Get those four faults under control and you’re a step nearer being published.