Once I could read fluently, reading became my default
activity. There were frequent trips to the library, pocket money was spent on
books and books were requested as birthday and Christmas presents. Once all the
chores were completed there was time for reading. My grandmother, however, had
other ideas.
Idle hands
“You should always do something with your hands,” she used
to say. “You need to produce something. Even while you’re sitting watching TV
or listening to the radio or chatting with your friends you can be knitting,
crocheting or embroidering.”
My grandmother worked hard all of her life. After my
grandfather came back from the Great War he couldn’t get a job so he opened a
greengrocer’s shop. He eventually did
get a job and my grandmother ran the shop until a week before she died aged 89!
In her spare time she knitted, crocheted, embroidered and made hats. She read
the Bible a little each day and indulged in a Sunday newspaper and a women’s
magazine once a week. She would rather absorb story through television and
radio – leaving her hands free to be productive.
We all need story
Even my grandmother, it seemed. My other grandmother, with
whom we lived, had been a tailoress before she married and had children. Then she made clothes for all of her
offspring. She would listen to the radio as she did this. We became used to Radio
4 as a constant background.
Later, her grown-up six daughters would pop into the market on
the way home from work on a Friday evening, spend all day Saturday running up a
new frock and then they’d go out to a dance in the new outfit on Saturday
evening. And whilst this was all going on and as they did their hair and
make-up they would gossip. That was their form of story.
My grandmother taught my mother how to make clothes and it
seemed natural to me then to much of my spare time behind a sewing machine or on
the floor pinning and cutting out. Always in the company of Radio 4 – the
Archers, the serial, Women’s Hour, the short story, the afternoon play, news,
features – all forms of story.
Mixed messages
So, both grandmothers were happy – I was learning the
necessary skills and I was using my hands to produce something. Yet my teachers
and my parents were pleased I was reading well and enjoyed it. They sent me to
the library and then weaned me off Enid Blyton. That I’d quickly learned to
read and was now fluent was supposed to be a good sign of things to come. I
didn’t know why and my head told me that my grandmothers were right. My heart
told me that the most delicious thing in the world would be to wade through
twenty or so old copies of the Bunty,
read one of my Famous Five books in
one sitting or, more recently, sit in the shade of a tree on a hot day with a
Maeve Binchy. Why?
The pictures are
better in the imagination
Someone once said that they preferred radio to television as
the pictures were better. Well, in a book without illustrations the pictures
are even better. It is entirely up to the reader to interpret all of the scenes
suggested by the words. The little black marks disappear and a very three
dimensional film with sounds, smells and sensations as well as sights plays out
in our heads. Perhaps this is what Roland Barthes was getting at with his
famous Death of the Author. What we
are alters as we read and what we read alters because of the experiences we
bring to that one point in time and space where the text and the reader meet.
Is it empathy we’re
learning?
Our reading – and our writing, actually – take us into other
worlds. We become the characters we read about. We understand something of
their lives that we might not have understood before.
Yes, we read to escape, and yes we read to reassure
ourselves that our experience matches that of others. Sometimes we read to find
out which outcomes may be on offer for issues that we’re dealing with now.
The writer puts characters into settings defined by time,
place and circumstances and sees what becomes of them. You might know several
facts about Victorian England. But start writing episodes of Ripper Street and you get more idea of what it was like living in those
times.
You might notice too, that those who are widely read are
more tolerant, more open-minded and generally see a bigger picture.
Do we learn to walk in another man’s shoes by reading about
him? Are we learning empathy? And is it a fantastic trick of nature that this
is actually an enjoyable activity - we tend to make ourselves very comfortable
as we read and write about the horrors of war and of having a broken heart.
Research
Art elevates the mind by increasing empathy, critical thinking
and tolerance, claims research that was conducted on a group that visited a
newly opened museum. A control group who did not visit the museum did not make
similar progress.
I’ve suspected this for some time and would really like to
look at more research into this, possibly being involved myself.
So, that is maybe the answer I need to give my grandmother.
I wasn’t being idle as I sat there reading. I was learning to understand the
world and increasing my capacity for accepting it.
No comments:
Post a Comment